Loading...

Work Smarter with AI

Real workflows. Real results.Join 420 readers

Latest

The first screen of the Hysaab homepage, rebuilt with this skill. The headline 'Your finance team. Without changing your accounting system.' and a Request access button
2026.10.26

These landing pages drew 15,000 bookmarks. Their designer just made the AI skill behind them free

Add this skill to a coding AI like Claude Code or Cursor and ask for a landing page. The AI first asks for the one action you want visitors to take. Then it settles the page structure, copy, FAQ, and design values and builds the page from scratch. Elaya, a product designer in Dubai with eight years of experience, released the skill for free. We collected founders who rebuilt their own product homepages with it and shipped them.

ai-design-skills · 3 cases

Insights2026.10.29

People with no ultrasound training swept a handheld probe across pregnant bellies, and AI dated the pregnancies as accurately as expert sonographers

People who had never learned ultrasound swept a handheld device across the belly, and the AI's gestational age estimates had a mean error of 4.2 days, no worse than expert sonographers (4.5 days). In Nairobi, where the AI was never trained on local data, the AI and the experts had the same mean error: 4.3 days. What field staff learned in six hours of hands-on training wasn't how to read scans. It was how to sweep evenly, at a quality the AI could read.

Insights2026.10.26

AI turned out 722 math manuscripts at once. Now the scarce resource is mathematicians to read them

OpenAI released 722 AI-generated math manuscripts at once. Of the 719 left after withdrawals, only 42% have proofs confirmed by the Lean program. This piece follows the record of 3 withdrawals over a calculation error the next day, 14 separate proof revisions, and how mathematicians reacted. Together they show math's bottleneck moving from producing proofs to finding people who can read and check them.

Insights2026.10.26

Handing classification to AI now costs almost nothing. Almost no one checked whether it got the answers right

TypeSafe's decision model Jev matched Claude Sonnet 5's score of 67.8% at $0.0004 per decision, but the answers it was graded against came from two AI models that aren't on the leaderboard. When Red Hat retested it on public data with labels already attached, Jev ranked first or fourth depending on the task, and the results did not show it was faster or cheaper. Now that decisions are nearly free, the first thing to check isn't the model's price. It's whether you have an answer key that can show the decisions were right for your work.

Load more
Weekly · Free

Hi, I'm Rush from Working Reference.

The week in AI: the BEST
just 3, straight to your inbox

Work Smarter with AI

420 readers get it every week

You're in See you in your inbox with the next issue.